Web Survey Bibliography
As new respondent acquisition strategies are developed, there is a corresponding responsibility to better understand the implications on sample quality and the downstream impact on research results and management decision making. This study compares survey results obtained using intercept sampling with results obtained from a double opt-in panel.
Conference Homepage (abstract) / (full text)
CASRO Journal Homepage (abstract) / (full text)
Conferences, workshops, tutorials, presentations
Web survey bibliography - CASRO Journal (9)
- Picking up the Bread Crumbs: Holistic Insights from Social Media; 2014; Souda, P.
- Speed (necessarily) doesn't kill: A new way to detect survey satisficing; 2013; Garland, P., Chen, K., Epstein, J., Suh, A.
- Cyborgs vs. Monsters: Assembling Modular Surveys to Create Complete Datasets; 2013; Johnson, E. P., Siluk, L., Tarraf, S.
- Shorter Isn't Always Better; 2013; Burdein, I.
- The Measurement of Consistency in Online Research; 2012; Gittelman, S. H., Trimarchi, E.
- Thinking Differently About How to Select Respondents for Surveys; 2012; Terhanian, G., Bremer, J.
- Benefits of Modular Design for Mobile and Online Surveys; 2012; Kelly, F., Johnson, A., Stevens, S.
- Widening the Net: A Comparison of Online Intercept and Access Panel Sampling; 2011; Bakken, D. G., Nawani, R.
- The Effect of E-Personality on Research Results; 1997; MacElroy, B.